🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a significant forecast – not just the winner citywide, and block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in the city, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious while failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

I had to do that because they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the tally frequently! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of ballots that came in after that and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible where election day went somewhat badly for Mamdani, where the opponent was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani added 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani get additional support from?

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse, young, tenants and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump previously backed Zohran now. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought we might go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He has 50.4% but remain probably 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus it’s not certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he does because afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an highly conservative area. That really surprised me. The independent kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island with a high participation. I believe occurred significant tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to the former president endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported the independent. Thus there existed a little resistance. But overall, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly supportive. So I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that every city in America can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.