🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a conditional permission that authorities allow or deny at their discretion. This represents the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the ruling administration is putting forward, which would determine the timing and location demonstrations can occur, with possible imprisonment for those who disobey these limitations.

Erosion of Democratic Rights

Earlier governments had already weakened this essential right: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement extensive new authorities, which global rights bodies had condemned as "serious and unjustified limitations" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these progressive assaults on freedom have effectively eliminated the historically earned right to freedom of protest.

Exploiting Tragedy to Rationalize Suppression

The latest restrictive measures are being defended by referring to last week's heinous antisemitic assault on a British mosque. There should be universal agreement that the security of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, using this atrocity as a justification to suppress opposition is not only unrelated to that duty but perverts it.

"When you cannot draw the line at genocide, you likely cannot draw the line at democracy," commented a well-known American author, a statement that rings true for the present administration.

Historical Perspective of Demonstration

Reflect on Britain's long tradition of protest and direct action against racism and fascism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to after World War II Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were labeled as extremists in their time, even while they were fighting for the rights of marginalized groups.

Present Situation

In the current complex situation, here's what's actually occurring: The Israeli government – a foreign state – is committing what United Nations investigations have characterized as systematic destruction. Its military actions have prompted the global justice body to release legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his ex-military leader.

Western popular sentiment has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of the public think Israel has likely committed war crimes. Most people would endorse a complete ban on weapons exports to the nation, and back the detention of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having essentially lost the public debate, Israel's supporters are now seizing on a vile antisemitic crime to try to suppress a popular campaign against a moral catastrophe. The British government appears to be involved in this effort. Government officials have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have permitted arms exports to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities little justification to take action.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish heritage with the actions of the government of Israel is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The standard interpretation of anti-Jewish prejudice, accepted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately challenged for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its central illustrations: that "making Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've reached a point where police authorities can suggest that protests opposing Israel's actions should be canceled because they might "accidentally or deliberately" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have declared that acknowledgment of Palestine as a nation has made political parties "complicit" in alleged abuse faced by British Jews.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the same day as the synagogue attack, the Israel's army killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from two years of daily atrocities that have taken many thousands of human lives. British politicians and news organizations have hardly hidden the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian life. This represents one of the boldest demonstrations of racism in our time.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already crossed a concerning boundary by proscribing a specific activist group, a non-violent, human rights-focused direct action organization. Thousands of British demonstrators have been arrested, mostly for carrying placards against genocide and supporting the banned organization. Many of those detained are pensioners; including a retired priest and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's not difficult to see where this path leads. In the United States, government officials helped demonize demonstrations supporting Palestine: a former House Speaker implied that some were "linked with" other nations, while the sitting leader described such demonstrations as anti-Jewish. In taking these actions, they helped legitimize the repressive measures on such protests – and on freedom of expression in general.

Looking Ahead

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to suppress dissent. What might a new administration do with this restrictive framework? Our forebears fought, suffered and died to secure our liberties. We may ultimately regret how easily we allowed them to be eroded.